Dangerous Holding Companies Rebuilding Empires at the Expense of the Rest of Us

Back in the 1910s and 1920s, Samuel Insull, president of Commonwealth Edison in Chicago, and banker J.P. Morgan put together a network of privately owned holding companies that controlled must of the major electric utilities in the US.  In the late 1920s and early 1930s, this dangerous pyramid of companies collapsed, threatening the stability of electrical service across the country.

In 1935, the US Congress passed the Public Utility Holding Company Act which limited the size and activities of utilities to prevent the collapse of dangerous financial structures that threatened the US electrical and natural gas infrastructure.

This federal law remained in place until the Cheney Administration and the Republican-controlled Congress repealed it as part of the 2005 Energy Policy Act.  The 2005 Energy Policy Act was the same law that granted massive rate payer subsidies to power companies for building new high voltage transmission lines.  Readers of The Power Line are very familiar with the disastrous impacts of this transmission subsidy scheme.

So erstwhile “free market” Republicans passed the 2005 Energy Policy Act to encourage the growth of new, unstable monopoly holding companies in the electricity markets and huge subsidy schemes for those same holding companies to build obsolete and unneeded high voltage transmission, all at the expense of electric retail customers.

We are witnessing the results of the repeal of the 1935 Utility Holding Company Act in real time.  Holding companies AEP and FirstEnergy have dumped obsolete coal-fired power plants onto the captive electric bills of West Virginians.  New post-2005 repeal holding companies are merging into ever fewer monopolies that operate in multiple business lines and exert increasing power in regional transmission organization cartels across the US.  The attempt by Chicago-based Exelon to swallow regional distribution company PEPCo Holdings on the East Coast is just the latest in the holding company monopoly game, and this one even includes Atlantic City.

I have posted a number of times, here, here, here and here, about the Exelon merger, because the forces at play in this case offer real insight into the train wreck that is West Virginia’s electrical system.  In the last few years, the WV PSC and the two Ohio-based holding companies that control WV’s electric utilities have played West Virginians for chumps.  AEP’s and FirstEnergy’s coal-fired power plants can no longer compete in wholesale electricity markets, so friendly regulators have forced their WV customers to pay for much more power plant capacity then customers will need for the next thirty years.

Exelon is moving to create that same situation for the customers of PEPCo’s companies.  Exelon’s shaky holding company structure is almost entirely dependent on expensive and obsolete nuclear power plants.  Like coal-fired power plants, nukes are struggling to compete in the free market.  Exelon is paying billions of dollars above PEPCo’s stock value because it wants access to PEPCo’s captive rate payers in stable regulated retail markets.

Wall Street bankers have seen the dangers facing unstable electric holding companies and their obsolete generating plants.  Starting last May with Barclays Bank, major investment banks have been downgrading the bonds of the entire electrical generation sector because they can no longer compete with natural gas plants, investment in energy efficiency and renewable power.

Last week, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis published an in depth report by WV’s own Cathy Kunkel describing exactly how and why Exelon wants to control a captive PEPCo Holdings for its own profit.

Also last week, the always entertaining and informative David Roberts provided an overview of the Exelon/PEPCo merger, plus some important history and context.

If you are interested in real electricity innovation in the US, you need to understand the massive forces that are arrayed against us.  Understanding the newly hatched monopoly holding companies that control electricity in our country is essential for identifying who is resisting change and why they are doing it.

While the new holding companies still control most of the US electrical grid, they are becoming increasingly desperate as their market base erodes and their financiers get weak in the knees.  These companies have become the enemies of the free market in electricity.  Their only hope is to manipulate the political and regulatory process to maintain their slipping grip on power, as their industry association recommended back in 2013.

Look closely at the links in this post, and you will be able to see beyond the misleading information that pops up in the media (most of it from power company press releases) to see what is really at stake.  As I have always said here on The Power Line, knowledge is power.

2 thoughts on “Dangerous Holding Companies Rebuilding Empires at the Expense of the Rest of Us

  1. Exelon’s CEO supported the “free market” model as long as he could, until Crane was starting to worry about his own job. He kept telling stockholders to be patient as long as he could. Exelon tried to get “free market” problems corrected and they were hammered for stating the truth about negative pricing and the sweetheart deals wind energy is getting. In Illinois wind is driving down the open market price by producing energy for the Production Tax Credit. Wind is also not playing by the same rules. Largely wind is getting sweetheart deals with 20 year Power Purchasing Agreement and doesn’t give a damn what the LMP price is. Looks like the LMP price is is being driven down with an actual surplus of energy.

    Exelon is getting screwed and no one cares. Wind is rolling in money. Consumers are paying more for wind but much less for all other energy. Somewhere around 20% of Illinois “free market” energy is wheeled to Eastern states. Unfortunately the solution that is working for Exelon appears to be the wind modeling and sking the states for their own sweetheart deal in an “open market”.

    With consumers winning with economically priced energy, no one cared Exelon was getting screwed. The politicians are all to giddy to give Exelon a sweetheart deal in this “unregulated” market. What good is having public utility commissions when the politicians eagerly create energy policy according to the will of lobbyists?

    I don’t like the way Exelon is maneuvering, but understand their motives. The Clinton nuclear plant is losing money and the tactics of wind is basically predatory pricing. Unfortunately, when predatory pricing is government approved, it is called “energy policy”, and advocates of wind believe Exelon should keep Clinton open for the benevolence of the people.

    Yes, nothing good will come from repealing PUCHA. It will invariably be a part of the nation’s next energy scandal.

    • I think the production tax credit is dwarfed by the subsidies received by Exelon’s nukes. The subsidies to nuclear power and coal burning power plants is significant multiples of even industrial wind power in the US.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s